# BetterWorld vs 1%Club

## Was die Daten sagen.

1%Club speichert Spenderdaten im EWR — ein praktischer Vorteil für DSGVO-sensible Kampagnen — BetterWorld nicht. Bei den Kernzahlen liegen BetterWorld und 1%Club dicht beieinander — die bessere Wahl hängt von der SEPA Direct Debit-Verfügbarkeit, der Sprachabdeckung und dem Sitz deiner Spender ab.

## Nebeneinander.

| Kennzahl | BetterWorld | 1%Club |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Empfänger bekommt | €96.80 | €100.00 |
| Plattformgebühr | 0% | 0% |
| Gebühr für die Zahlungsabwicklung | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 53 |
| Länderabdeckung | 0 | 0 |
| Datenstandort | — | EEA |
| Sprachen | 1 | 2 |
| Unterstützte Zahlungsarten | 5 | 2 |

## Nimm BetterWorld, wenn

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Nimm 1%Club, wenn

> Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

- Mission-driven focus on social initiatives aligned with the UN Global Goals.
- Personal coaching of campaign initiators rather than a purely self-serve model.
- Bilingual Dutch and English interface.
- Accepts donations in euros and US dollars.

