# BetterWorld vs Big Give

## Was die Daten sagen.

Bei Zahlung per Credit card kommen mit Big Give pro 100 rund 3.20 mehr beim Empfänger an als mit BetterWorld (£100.00 vs. €96.80 pro 100). Bei den Kernzahlen liegen BetterWorld und Big Give dicht beieinander — die bessere Wahl hängt von der SEPA Direct Debit-Verfügbarkeit, der Sprachabdeckung und dem Sitz deiner Spender ab.

## Nebeneinander.

| Kennzahl | BetterWorld | Big Give |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Empfänger bekommt | €96.80 | £100.00 |
| Plattformgebühr | 0% | 0% |
| Gebühr für die Zahlungsabwicklung | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 77 |
| Länderabdeckung | 0 | 1 |
| Datenstandort | — | UK |
| Sprachen | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Zahlungsarten | 5 | 4 |

## Nimm BetterWorld, wenn

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Nimm Big Give, wenn

> UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

- Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
- Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
- Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
- Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.