# OnParticipe vs Teaming

## Hvad tallene siger.

OnParticipe viser den højeste Trustpilot-score (3.0/5), men den hviler på kun 21 anmeldelser — for få til at opveje Teamings 2.8/5 fra 10 anmeldelser. På nøgletallene ligger OnParticipe og Teaming tæt — det bedste valg afhænger af MobilePay-understøttelse, sprogdækning og hvor dine donorer er.

## Side om side.

| Mål | OnParticipe | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Modtager får | €100.00 | kr100.00 |
| Platformgebyr | 0% | 0% |
| Transaktionsgebyr | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + kr0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3 (21) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 74 | 80 |
| Landedækning | 1 | 0 |
| Datalagring | France | — |
| Sprog | 1 | 0 |
| Understøttede betalingsmetoder | 1 | 0 |

## Vælg OnParticipe, hvis

> French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

- No commission on collections, so organisers keep the entire amount raised and ticket revenue.
- Designed and hosted in France, with French customer support available seven days a week.
- Funded by an optional donor tip rather than a mandatory platform charge.
- Systematic identity-document checks on organisers for fraud control.


## Vælg Teaming, hvis

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.