givingplatforms.com

Sprog & region

Vælg det sprog, du vil have siden på, og det land, du samler ind til eller fra. Det bruger vi til at vælge den mest udbredte betalingsmetode og valuta som standard.

Verificeret · 2026-06-08 Ejerskab
Dyst

Alvarum vs Pledge

Alvarum logo
Alvarum
France · 0 lande

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

Ingen vurdering endnu
Læs hele anmeldelsen →
Pledge logo
Pledge
US · 1 lande

US-based individuals, nonprofits and purpose-driven companies that want a free-to-start fundraiser with a wide range of giving methods - cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, stock, donor-advised funds and crypto - plus Shopify and API-based embedded giving.

Ingen vurdering endnu
Læs hele anmeldelsen →
Det korte af det lange

Af hver 100 donerede leverer Alvarum 1.05 mere per 100 til modtageren end Pledge.

Hver platform prissættes i sin egen valuta: Alvarum i EUR, Pledge i USD.

Beviset

Side om side.

Mål Alvarum Pledge
Modtager får (per 100) €97.85★ vinder $96.80
Platformgebyr 0% 0%
Transaktionsgebyr 1.9% + €0.25★ vinder 2.9% + $0.30
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Landedækning 0 lande 1 lande★ vinder
Datalagring France US
Sprog 2★ vinder 1
Understøttede betalingsmetoder 1 10★ vinder
Dom

Vinder for hver kategori.

Bedre gebyrer
Alvarum

€97.85 mod $96.80 når frem til modtageren.

Højere Trustpilot-vurdering
Uafgjort

— mod — på Trustpilot.

Bredere landedækning
Pledge

1 mod 0 lande.

Bedre for europæiske indsamlere
Uafgjort

Begge har samme tilgang til datalagring.

Vælg efter behov

Vælg ud fra, hvem du er.

Vælg Alvarum, hvis

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

  • Donations are routed directly to the beneficiary charity and settled on an automated monthly cycle rather than held by the platform.
  • Strong fit for sports-challenge and participatory event fundraising such as marathons and cycling events.
  • European local payment methods - iDEAL, Bancontact, Sofort, and SEPA direct debit - alongside Visa and Mastercard cards.
  • Payments handled by HiPay, a payment institution authorised by France's ACPR; Alvarum registered with ORIAS as a donation crowdfunding intermediary.
Læs hele anmeldelsen →
Vælg Pledge, hvis

US-based individuals, nonprofits and purpose-driven companies that want a free-to-start fundraiser with a wide range of giving methods - cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, stock, donor-advised funds and crypto - plus Shopify and API-based embedded giving.

  • No mandatory platform fee - funded by optional donor tipping, with most donors choosing to cover the fees.
  • Exceptionally broad giving methods: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, Google Pay, stock, donor-advised funds and cryptocurrency.
  • Donations are regranted through the Pledgeling Foundation, a registered 501(c)(3) public charity, with multi-state US fundraising compliance.
  • Shopify "Give & Grow" app and embedded-giving APIs and widgets for e-commerce and product integrations.
Læs hele anmeldelsen →
Overvej også

En tredje mulighed.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

Flere dyster

Andre sammenligninger.

FAQ

Ofte stillede spørgsmål

Hvad er billigst, Alvarum eller Pledge?

Af hver 100 donerede leverer Alvarum cirka €97.85 til modtageren, og Pledge leverer cirka $96.80. De faktiske omkostninger afhænger af den betalingsmetode, donorerne vælger.

Hvad er bedst for europæiske nonprofit-organisationer?

Begge platforme opererer inden for EØS-rammen. Vælg ud fra dækningen af lokale betalingsmetoder og sprogunderstøttelse.

Hvilken platform har størst landedækning?

Alvarum opererer i 0 lande; Pledge opererer i 1.

Sådan rangerer vi

Rangeringerne er resultatet af en offentlig redaktionel metode — åben for fagfællekritik. Vi oplyser om ejerskab, scorevægtninger og hver eneste ændring.

Læs metoden →