# Teaming vs voordekunst

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 8.47 more of every 100 donated than voordekunst (£100.00 vs €91.53 per 100). voordekunst stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Teaming does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Teaming | voordekunst |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £100.00 | €91.53 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 8.47% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.8 (10) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 80 | 76 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | EU |
| Languages | 0 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 0 |

## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.


## Choose voordekunst if

> Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

- Deep specialization in arts and culture with vetted, project-based campaigns.
- Operated by a CBF-recognized charitable foundation with funds held in trust.
- Hands-on coaching, workshops, and editorial guidance for campaign makers.
- Supports iDEAL, credit card, PayPal, plus Bancontact, Maestro, and Sofort.