# Supp.to vs Teaming

## What the data says.

On the headline numbers, Supp.to and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Supp.to | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £99.51 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.49 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 56 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 2 | 0 |
| Data residency | NL | — |
| Languages | 2 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 17 | 0 |

## Choose Supp.to if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.