# Raisely vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about £1.70 more of every £100 donated than Raisely (£100.00 vs £98.30). On the headline numbers, Raisely and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Raisely | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £98.30 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.4% + £0.30 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 82 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 8 | 0 |
| Data residency | AU/UK/US | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 0 |

## Choose Raisely if

> Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

- Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
- Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
- Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
- Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.