# PPL vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 8.61 more of every 100 donated than PPL (£100.00 vs €91.39 per 100). On the headline numbers, PPL and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | PPL | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €91.39 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 6.15% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.46% + €0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 57 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 2 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose PPL if

> Portuguese entrepreneurs, creatives, and social or humanitarian causes that want a local, Portuguese-language crowdfunding platform offering both reward-based campaigns and a dedicated donations area.

- Long-established in Portugal, operating since 2011.
- Supports both reward-based crowdfunding and a dedicated 'PPL Causas' donations area for social causes.
- Offers all-or-nothing and flexible funding models.
- Supporters can give unconditionally to causes, transferring even if the goal is not met.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.