# PIFworld vs Yapla

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Yapla delivers about 2.20 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (£95.80 vs €93.60 per 100). On the headline numbers, PIFworld and Yapla are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | PIFworld | Yapla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €93.60 | £95.80 |
| Platform fee | 6.05% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.35 | 3.9% + £0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.3 (6) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 56 | 81 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 5 |
| Data residency | — | Canada or EU (by org region) |
| Languages | 2 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 4 |

## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.


## Choose Yapla if

> Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

- All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
- Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
- Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
- Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.