# PIFworld vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 6.40 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (£100.00 vs €93.60 per 100). On the headline numbers, PIFworld and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | PIFworld | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €93.60 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 6.05% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.35 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 56 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 2 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 0 |

## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.