# PIFworld vs Supp.to

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about 5.91 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (£99.51 vs €93.60 per 100). On the headline numbers, PIFworld and Supp.to are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | PIFworld | Supp.to |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €93.60 | £99.51 |
| Platform fee | 6.05% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.35 | 0% + £0.49 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 56 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 2 |
| Data residency | — | NL |
| Languages | 2 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 17 |

## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.


## Choose Supp.to if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.