# Petje Af vs Supp.to

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about £5.51 more of every £100 donated than Petje Af (£99.51 vs £94.00). On the headline numbers, Petje Af and Supp.to are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Petje Af | Supp.to |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £94.00 | £99.51 |
| Platform fee | 6% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + £0.49 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 63 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 2 |
| Data residency | — | NL |
| Languages | 0 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 17 |

## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.


## Choose Supp.to if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.