# OnParticipe vs Petje Af

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, OnParticipe delivers about 6.00 more of every 100 donated than Petje Af (€100.00 vs £94.00 per 100). On the headline numbers, OnParticipe and Petje Af are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | OnParticipe | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | £94.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3 (21) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 74 | 63 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | France | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 0 |

## Choose OnParticipe if

> French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

- No commission on collections, so organisers keep the entire amount raised and ticket revenue.
- Designed and hosted in France, with French customer support available seven days a week.
- Funded by an optional donor tip rather than a mandatory platform charge.
- Systematic identity-document checks on organisers for fraud control.


## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.