# Migranodearena vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 6.45 more of every 100 donated than Migranodearena (£100.00 vs €93.55 per 100). On the headline numbers, Migranodearena and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Migranodearena | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €93.55 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 5% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.2% + €0.25 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 3 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 3 | 0 |

## Choose Migranodearena if

> Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

- Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
- Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
- Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
- Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.