# Migranodearena vs Petje Af

## What the data says.

On the headline numbers, Migranodearena and Petje Af are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Migranodearena | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €93.55 | £94.00 |
| Platform fee | 5% | 6% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.2% + €0.25 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 63 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 3 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 3 | 0 |

## Choose Migranodearena if

> Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

- Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
- Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
- Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
- Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.


## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.