# Mightycause vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 4.78 more of every 100 donated than Mightycause (£100.00 vs $95.22 per 100). On the headline numbers, Mightycause and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Mightycause | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | $95.22 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 1.99% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.2% + $0.29 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.2 (1) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 78 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 7 | 0 |

## Choose Mightycause if

> US nonprofits looking for a free or low-cost starting point for donation pages, peer-to-peer campaigns, and event fundraising.

- Free plan available at $0 per month.
- Nonprofit-focused toolset: donation pages, peer-to-peer, and event fundraising.
- Used by more than 76,000 nonprofit organisations.
- Supports cards, PayPal, Venmo, ACH, and digital wallets.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.