# Little Phil vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 2.05 more of every 100 donated than Little Phil (£100.00 vs A$97.95 per 100). On the headline numbers, Little Phil and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Little Phil | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | A$97.95 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.75% + A$0.30 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 51 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | Outside AU (SG/HK/US) | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose Little Phil if

> Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

- Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
- Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
- Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
- Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.