# Little Phil vs PIFworld

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Little Phil delivers about 4.35 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (A$97.95 vs €93.60 per 100). On the headline numbers, Little Phil and PIFworld are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Little Phil | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | A$97.95 | €93.60 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6.05% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.75% + A$0.30 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 51 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | Outside AU (SG/HK/US) | — |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose Little Phil if

> Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

- Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
- Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
- Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
- Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.


## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.