# Kagnotte vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 1.25 more of every 100 donated than Kagnotte (£100.00 vs €98.75 per 100). Kagnotte holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 3.9/5 across 233 reviews, against 2.8/5 across 10 for Teaming.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Kagnotte | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €98.75 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 1% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.9 (233) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 49 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 2 | 0 |

## Choose Kagnotte if

> French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

- Low headline pricing: a small per-contribution commission plus a fixed amount, undercutting many higher-rate rivals.
- Unlimited withdrawals to a bank account at no additional charge.
- No subscription or setup cost to create and manage a pot.
- Regulated fund custody via Lemonway, authorised by France's ACPR (no. 16568).


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.