# Kagnotte vs Little Phil

## What the data says.

On the headline numbers, Kagnotte and Little Phil are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Kagnotte | Little Phil |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €98.75 | A$97.95 |
| Platform fee | 1% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 1.75% + A$0.30 |
| Trustpilot | 3.9 (233) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 49 | 51 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | Outside AU (SG/HK/US) |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 2 | 4 |

## Choose Kagnotte if

> French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

- Low headline pricing: a small per-contribution commission plus a fixed amount, undercutting many higher-rate rivals.
- Unlimited withdrawals to a bank account at no additional charge.
- No subscription or setup cost to create and manage a pot.
- Regulated fund custody via Lemonway, authorised by France's ACPR (no. 16568).


## Choose Little Phil if

> Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

- Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
- Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
- Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
- Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.