# iRaiser vs Yapla

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about £2.05 more of every £100 donated than Yapla (£97.85 vs £95.80). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Yapla does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iRaiser | Yapla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.85 | £95.80 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + £0.25 | 3.9% + £0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.3 (6) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 75 | 81 |
| Country coverage | 19 | 5 |
| Data residency | EEA | Canada or EU (by org region) |
| Languages | 5 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 23 | 4 |

## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.


## Choose Yapla if

> Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

- All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
- Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
- Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
- Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.