# iRaiser vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about £2.15 more of every £100 donated than iRaiser (£100.00 vs £97.85). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Teaming does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iRaiser | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.85 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + £0.25 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 75 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 19 | 0 |
| Data residency | EEA | — |
| Languages | 5 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 23 | 0 |

## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.