# iRaiser vs PIFworld

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about 4.25 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (£97.85 vs €93.60 per 100). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while PIFworld does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iRaiser | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.85 | €93.60 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6.05% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + £0.25 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 75 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 19 | 1 |
| Data residency | EEA | — |
| Languages | 5 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 23 | 0 |

## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.


## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.