# iRaiser vs Petje Af

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about £3.85 more of every £100 donated than Petje Af (£97.85 vs £94.00). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Petje Af does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iRaiser | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.85 | £94.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + £0.25 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 75 | 63 |
| Country coverage | 19 | 0 |
| Data residency | EEA | — |
| Languages | 5 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 23 | 0 |

## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.


## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.