# iRaiser vs OnParticipe

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, OnParticipe delivers about 2.15 more of every 100 donated than iRaiser (€100.00 vs £97.85 per 100). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while OnParticipe does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iRaiser | OnParticipe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.85 | €100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + £0.25 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 3 (21) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 75 | 74 |
| Country coverage | 19 | 1 |
| Data residency | EEA | France |
| Languages | 5 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 23 | 1 |

## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.


## Choose OnParticipe if

> French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

- No commission on collections, so organisers keep the entire amount raised and ticket revenue.
- Designed and hosted in France, with French customer support available seven days a week.
- Funded by an optional donor tip rather than a mandatory platform charge.
- Systematic identity-document checks on organisers for fraud control.