# iRaiser vs Migranodearena

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about 4.30 more of every 100 donated than Migranodearena (£97.85 vs €93.55 per 100). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Migranodearena does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iRaiser | Migranodearena |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £97.85 | €93.55 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 5% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + £0.25 | 1.2% + €0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 75 | 72 |
| Country coverage | 19 | 1 |
| Data residency | EEA | — |
| Languages | 5 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 23 | 3 |

## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.


## Choose Migranodearena if

> Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

- Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
- Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
- Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
- Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.