# impactory vs Yapla

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Yapla delivers about 1.80 more of every 100 donated than impactory (£95.80 vs €94.00 per 100). On the headline numbers, impactory and Yapla are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | impactory | Yapla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €94.00 | £95.80 |
| Platform fee | 6% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 3.9% + £0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.3 (6) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 39 | 81 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 5 |
| Data residency | — | Canada or EU (by org region) |
| Languages | 2 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 6 | 4 |

## Choose impactory if

> Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

- Automated Austrian tax-deductibility: donation receipts downloadable as PDF or emailed for organisations with charitable status.
- Positions itself as Austria's largest donation platform, hosting a few hundred projects from vetted non-profit organisations.
- Organisations are screened before they can publish, adding a layer of donor trust.
- Donors can give as a one-off guest or through a free account that tracks their cumulative giving.


## Choose Yapla if

> Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

- All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
- Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
- Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
- Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.