# impactory vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 6.00 more of every 100 donated than impactory (£100.00 vs €94.00 per 100). On the headline numbers, impactory and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | impactory | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €94.00 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 6% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 39 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 2 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 6 | 0 |

## Choose impactory if

> Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

- Automated Austrian tax-deductibility: donation receipts downloadable as PDF or emailed for organisations with charitable status.
- Positions itself as Austria's largest donation platform, hosting a few hundred projects from vetted non-profit organisations.
- Organisations are screened before they can publish, adding a layer of donor trust.
- Donors can give as a one-off guest or through a free account that tracks their cumulative giving.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.