# impactory vs PIFworld

## What the data says.

On the headline numbers, impactory and PIFworld are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | impactory | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €94.00 | €93.60 |
| Platform fee | 6% | 6.05% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 39 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 2 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 6 | 0 |

## Choose impactory if

> Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

- Automated Austrian tax-deductibility: donation receipts downloadable as PDF or emailed for organisations with charitable status.
- Positions itself as Austria's largest donation platform, hosting a few hundred projects from vetted non-profit organisations.
- Organisations are screened before they can publish, adding a layer of donor trust.
- Donors can give as a one-off guest or through a free account that tracks their cumulative giving.


## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.