# iHelp vs Yapla

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 4.20 more of every 100 donated than Yapla (€100.00 vs £95.80 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Yapla does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iHelp | Yapla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | £95.80 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 3.9% + £0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.3 (6) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 50 | 81 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 5 |
| Data residency | EU | Canada or EU (by org region) |
| Languages | 2 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 4 |

## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.


## Choose Yapla if

> Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

- All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
- Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
- Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
- Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.