# iHelp vs Petje Af

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 6.00 more of every 100 donated than Petje Af (€100.00 vs £94.00 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Petje Af does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iHelp | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | £94.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 50 | 63 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 2 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 0 |

## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.


## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.