# iHelp vs Mightycause

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 4.78 more of every 100 donated than Mightycause (€100.00 vs $95.22 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Mightycause does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iHelp | Mightycause |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | $95.22 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 1.99% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 2.2% + $0.29 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 3.2 (1) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 50 | 78 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 2 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 7 |

## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.


## Choose Mightycause if

> US nonprofits looking for a free or low-cost starting point for donation pages, peer-to-peer campaigns, and event fundraising.

- Free plan available at $0 per month.
- Nonprofit-focused toolset: donation pages, peer-to-peer, and event fundraising.
- Used by more than 76,000 nonprofit organisations.
- Supports cards, PayPal, Venmo, ACH, and digital wallets.