# iHelp vs Little Phil

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 2.05 more of every 100 donated than Little Phil (€100.00 vs A$97.95 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Little Phil does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iHelp | Little Phil |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | A$97.95 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 1.75% + A$0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 50 | 51 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | EU | Outside AU (SG/HK/US) |
| Languages | 2 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 4 |

## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.


## Choose Little Phil if

> Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

- Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
- Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
- Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
- Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.