# iHelp vs Inzamelingsacties

## What the data says.

iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Inzamelingsacties does not. On the headline numbers, iHelp and Inzamelingsacties are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | iHelp | Inzamelingsacties |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €100.00 | €100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 50 | 0 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 2 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 3 |

## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.


## Choose Inzamelingsacties if

> Dutch organisers and charities seeking a low-cost, commission-light national donation platform for personal, event, and memorial campaigns, who can verify current activity and processing fees before committing.

- No platform commission and no subscription cost, per the platform's homepage.
- Keep-it-all model: no minimum target required before withdrawing funds.
- Supports the core Dutch payment method iDEAL alongside credit card and PayPal.
- Dashboard for tracking campaigns, donors, and payouts.