# Grassrootz vs PIFworld

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Grassrootz delivers about 6.40 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (A$100.00 vs €93.60 per 100). On the headline numbers, Grassrootz and PIFworld are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Grassrootz | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | A$100.00 | €93.60 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6.05% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + A$0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 76 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 0 |

## Choose Grassrootz if

> Australian and New Zealand registered charities running peer-to-peer campaigns and endurance-event fundraising who want supporter-driven tools and in-person cashless giving rather than personal one-off fundraisers.

- Core fundraising features provided to charity members at no cost, funded by an optional donor contribution at checkout.
- Partnerships with major endurance events including City2Surf and the Sydney, Auckland, Brisbane, and Melbourne marathons.
- Strong peer-to-peer tooling built around supporters' personal networks.
- In-person cashless giving via Tap'n'Donate card readers for physical events.


## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.