# Grassrootz vs iRaiser

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Grassrootz delivers about 2.15 more of every 100 donated than iRaiser (A$100.00 vs £97.85 per 100). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Grassrootz does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Grassrootz | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | A$100.00 | £97.85 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + A$0.00 | 1.9% + £0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 76 | 75 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 19 |
| Data residency | — | EEA |
| Languages | 1 | 5 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 23 |

## Choose Grassrootz if

> Australian and New Zealand registered charities running peer-to-peer campaigns and endurance-event fundraising who want supporter-driven tools and in-person cashless giving rather than personal one-off fundraisers.

- Core fundraising features provided to charity members at no cost, funded by an optional donor contribution at checkout.
- Partnerships with major endurance events including City2Surf and the Sydney, Auckland, Brisbane, and Melbourne marathons.
- Strong peer-to-peer tooling built around supporters' personal networks.
- In-person cashless giving via Tap'n'Donate card readers for physical events.


## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.