# Give Lively vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 2.50 more of every 100 donated than Give Lively (£100.00 vs $97.50 per 100). On the headline numbers, Give Lively and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Give Lively | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | $97.50 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.2% + $0.30 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (1) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 87 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | US | — |
| Languages | 0 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 6 | 0 |

## Choose Give Lively if

> US 501(c)(3) nonprofits seeking a fully underwritten, no-cost fundraising toolkit - campaign pages, text-to-donate, peer-to-peer, and events - backed by philanthropist founders rather than platform charges.

- Underwritten by philanthropist founders, so member nonprofits are not charged for the software.
- Full toolkit: campaign pages, donation widgets, text-to-donate, peer-to-peer, team fundraising, and events.
- Donors can opt to cover processing, helping organizations keep the full gift.
- Rapid disbursement with no holding period.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.