# GINGER vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 2.15 more of every 100 donated than GINGER (£100.00 vs €97.85 per 100). GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Teaming does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | GINGER | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €97.85 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.8% + €0.35 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose GINGER if

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.