# GINGER vs Petje Af

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, GINGER delivers about 3.85 more of every 100 donated than Petje Af (€97.85 vs £94.00 per 100). GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Petje Af does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | GINGER | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €97.85 | £94.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.8% + €0.35 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 63 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose GINGER if

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.