# Gandee vs PIFworld

## What the data says.

Gandee stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while PIFworld does not. On the headline numbers, Gandee and PIFworld are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Gandee | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €94.00 | €93.60 |
| Platform fee | 6% | 6.05% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 56 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 1 |
| Data residency | EU | — |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 0 |

## Choose Gandee if

> French individuals and companies who want to raise money for vetted associations through solidarity pots, corporate social-responsibility campaigns, or event-based giving, with automatic tax receipts.

- Donors give without charge; organisers create solidarity pots without a platform commission
- Partner associations are vetted before they can receive funds
- Automatic tax-deduction receipts for individual and corporate donors
- Corporate social-responsibility (RSE) campaigns and sponsor matching for companies


## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.