# Funraisin vs GINGER

## What the data says.

GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Funraisin does not. On the headline numbers, Funraisin and GINGER are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Funraisin | GINGER |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £100.00 | €97.85 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + £0.00 | 1.8% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 78 | 65 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | AU/EU/NA | EU |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 7 | 4 |

## Choose Funraisin if

> Established nonprofits and charities running event-based, peer-to-peer, and recurring fundraising programmes that want a fully branded, white-label platform and have the capacity to operate it.

- White-label, highly customisable platform that lets nonprofits run fully branded fundraising sites.
- Broad feature suite: donations, peer-to-peer, events and ticketing, raffles, recurring giving, and a built-in CMS.
- Wide payment coverage including cards, PayPal, Apple Pay and Google Pay via Stripe, iDEAL, ACH, and BECS direct debit.
- Multilingual deployments via optional language packs and support for a wide range of currencies.


## Choose GINGER if

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)