# Funraise vs Migranodearena

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Migranodearena delivers about 2.05 more of every 100 donated than Funraise (€93.55 vs £91.50 per 100). On the headline numbers, Funraise and Migranodearena are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Funraise | Migranodearena |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £91.50 | €93.55 |
| Platform fee | 5% | 5% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.60 | 1.2% + €0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 72 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | US | — |
| Languages | 0 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 3 |

## Choose Funraise if

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.


## Choose Migranodearena if

> Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

- Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
- Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
- Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
- Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.