# Funraise vs iHelp

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 8.50 more of every 100 donated than Funraise (€100.00 vs £91.50 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Funraise does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Funraise | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £91.50 | €100.00 |
| Platform fee | 5% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.60 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 50 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | US | EU |
| Languages | 0 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 1 |

## Choose Funraise if

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.


## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.