# Funraise vs GINGER

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, GINGER delivers about 6.35 more of every 100 donated than Funraise (€97.85 vs £91.50 per 100). GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Funraise does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Funraise | GINGER |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £91.50 | €97.85 |
| Platform fee | 5% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.60 | 1.8% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 65 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | US | EU |
| Languages | 0 | 1 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 4 |

## Choose Funraise if

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.


## Choose GINGER if

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)