# FundRazr vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about £3.20 more of every £100 donated than FundRazr (£100.00 vs £96.80). On the headline numbers, FundRazr and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | FundRazr | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £96.80 | £100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.30 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 0 |
| Data residency | Canada and US | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose FundRazr if

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.