# FundRazr vs PIFworld

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, FundRazr delivers about 3.20 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (£96.80 vs €93.60 per 100). On the headline numbers, FundRazr and PIFworld are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | FundRazr | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £96.80 | €93.60 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 6.05% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.30 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | Canada and US | — |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose FundRazr if

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choose PIFworld if

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.

