# FundRazr vs Migranodearena

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, FundRazr delivers about 3.25 more of every 100 donated than Migranodearena (£96.80 vs €93.55 per 100). On the headline numbers, FundRazr and Migranodearena are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | FundRazr | Migranodearena |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £96.80 | €93.55 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 5% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.30 | 1.2% + €0.25 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 72 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | Canada and US | — |
| Languages | 1 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 3 |

## Choose FundRazr if

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choose Migranodearena if

> Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

- Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
- Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
- Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
- Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.