# FundRazr vs iRaiser

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about £1.05 more of every £100 donated than FundRazr (£97.85 vs £96.80). iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while FundRazr does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | FundRazr | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £96.80 | £97.85 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.30 | 1.9% + £0.25 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 75 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 19 |
| Data residency | Canada and US | EEA |
| Languages | 1 | 5 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 23 |

## Choose FundRazr if

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choose iRaiser if

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.

