# FundRazr vs iHelp

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 3.20 more of every 100 donated than FundRazr (€100.00 vs £96.80 per 100). iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while FundRazr does not.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | FundRazr | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | £96.80 | €100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + £0.30 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 50 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 1 |
| Data residency | Canada and US | EU |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 1 |

## Choose FundRazr if

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choose iHelp if

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.