# EcoCrowd vs Funraise

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Funraise delivers about 1.75 more of every 100 donated than EcoCrowd (£91.50 vs €89.75 per 100). On the headline numbers, EcoCrowd and Funraise are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | EcoCrowd | Funraise |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | €89.75 | £91.50 |
| Platform fee | 8% | 5% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + €0.35 | 2.9% + £0.60 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 46 | 79 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | DE | US |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 3 | 5 |

## Choose EcoCrowd if

> German environmental and sustainability nonprofits - associations, foundations, and gGmbHs - seeking community-backed funding for SDG-aligned projects through a curated monthly donation pool.

- Operated by the Deutsche Umweltstiftung, an established German environmental foundation.
- Sharp focus on sustainability and UN Sustainable Development Goal-aligned projects.
- Distinctive monthly donation-pool model with a community vote on which project is funded.
- Accepts PayPal and bank transfer, with donations starting from one euro.


## Choose Funraise if

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.